Learn About The Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by Findlaw Staff
A. A civil action may be filed in a court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of the Healthy Workplaces Act within three years from the date the alleged violation occurred; provided that the time limit to file a civil action established by this subsection shall be tolled during an investigation by the division of the violation or related violations by the same employer. A lack of an investigation by the division shall not act as a bar to a civil action brought by a complainant pursuant to the Healthy Workplaces Act.
B. The division, the office of the attorney general or a person or entity that has a member who has been affected by a violation of the Healthy Workplaces Act may bring a civil action for a violation of the Healthy Workplaces Act.
C. A civil action to enforce any provision of the Healthy Workplaces Act may be filed without first filing an administrative complaint with the division and may:
(1) encompass all violations that occurred after the effective date of the Healthy Workplaces Act as part of a continuing course of conduct, regardless of the date on which the violations occurred;
(2) be pursued by an employee on behalf of the employee or be pursued by an employee on behalf of other employees similarly situated; or
(3) be pursued by an agent or representative designated by an employee.
D. It shall not be a defense to any action brought pursuant to this section that the complaint was brought by or in regard to the employment of a worker who does not have evidence of having a legal presence in the United States.
E. The parties in a civil action regarding retaliation by an employer shall be subject to the following burdens of proof:
(1) when an employee presents a prima facie showing of retaliation, the employer shall then have the burden to establish a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse employment action; and
(2) when an employer meets the burden of proof required by Paragraph (1) of this subsection, the employee shall then have the burden to establish that the reason cited by the employer was pretextual.
Cite this article: FindLaw.com - New Mexico Statutes Chapter 50. Employment Law § 50-17-10. Civil actions; time limits; burdens of proof - last updated January 01, 2024 | https://codes.findlaw.com/nm/chapter-50-employment-law/nm-st-sect-50-17-10/
FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature before relying on it for your legal needs.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes, visit FindLaw’s Learn About the Law.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)