Arkansas Code Title 20. Public Health and Welfare § 20-16-1403. Legislative findings

(1) Pain receptors known as nociceptors are present throughout the unborn child's entire body by no later than sixteen (16) weeks after fertilization, and nerves link these receptors to the brain's thalamus and subcortical plate by no later than twenty (20) weeks;

(3) In the unborn child, application of such painful stimuli is associated with significant increases in stress hormones known as the stress response;

(4) Subjection to such painful stimuli is associated with long-term harmful neurodeveolopmental  1 effects, such as altered pain sensitivity and, possibly, emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities later in life;

(5) For the purposes of surgery on unborn children, fetal anesthesia is routinely administered and is associated with a decrease in stress hormones compared to those levels when painful stimuli are applied without such anesthesia;

(7) Substantial evidence indicates that children born missing the bulk of the cerebral cortex, those with hydranencephaly, nevertheless experience pain;

(8) In adults, stimulation or ablation of the cerebral cortex does not alter pain perception, while stimulation or ablation of the thalamus does;

(9) Substantial evidence indicates that structures used for pain processing in early development differ from those of adults and use different neural elements available at specific times during development, such as the subcortical plate, to fulfill the role of pain processing;

(10) Consequently, there is substantial medical evidence that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain by twenty (20) weeks after fertilization;

(11) It is the purpose of the state to assert a compelling state interest in protecting the lives of unborn children from the stage at which substantial medical evidence indicates that they are capable of feeling pain; and

(12) Mindful of Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137 (1996), in which in the context of determining the severability of a state statute regulating abortion, the United States Supreme Court noted that an explicit statement of legislative intent specifically made applicable to a particular statute is of greater weight than a general savings or severability clause, it is the intent of the state that § 1-2-117 be specifically applied to this subchapter, and moreover the General Assembly declares that it would have passed this subchapter, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this subchapter, irrespective of the fact that any one (1) or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words, or any of their applications, were to be declared unconstitutional.