Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes, a free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes, visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
The Congress finds that--
(1)?the framers of the Constitution, recognizing free exercise of religion as an unalienable right, secured its protection in the First Amendment to the Constitution;
(2)?laws ?neutral? toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise;
(3)?governments should not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification;
(4)?in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990) the Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion; ?and
(5)?the compelling interest test as set forth in prior Federal court rulings is a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing prior governmental interests.
The purposes of this chapter are--
(1)?to restore the compelling interest test as set forth in Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) and to guarantee its application in all cases where free exercise of religion is substantially burdened; ?and
(2)?to provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious exercise is substantially burdened by government.
Cite this article: FindLaw.com - 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare § 2000bb. Congressional findings and declaration of purposes - last updated January 01, 2018 | https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-42-the-public-health-and-welfare/42-usc-sect-2000bb.html
FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs.